A few of this week's PME 811 readings referenced "revisionist perspectives" or "revisionism". I was reminded of a podcast that has long been on my "to listen" list, but I've never gotten around to it. Malcolm Gladwell's Revisionist History podcast piqued my interest as I am a big fan of his books The Tipping Point, Blink, and Outliers.
I listened to "Hallelujah" from season one. In this podcast, Gladwell notes that art lover David Gallenson indicates there are two types of innovators
Conceptual Innovators - Those who have meticulously planned and work
quickly, have specific ideas, and execute. Example Picasso. Exemplifies
what most people consider when they think of "genius".
Experimental Innovators - Those who never have a clear idea, work by trial and error, do endless drafts, work slowly, take a lifetime to create. Example Cezanne - who was known for
Gladwell talks about the famous song Hallelujah, originally written by Leonard Cohen. It has since been covered by John Cale, Jeff Buckley, Bon Jovi, and several other artists. I am sure you have heard it. Gladwell tells an interesting story of Cohen (termed an Experimental Innovator who took years to write the song), then the song was made famous by Jeff Buckley, a Conceptual Innovator, 15 years later when it is finally identified as a work of genius.
To relate this to the content I read during our course this week, this illustration of differing degrees of success within innovators makes me reconsider my glossary definition of innovation. Perhaps innovation requires a purpose, planning and successful execution.
Sources
Gladwell, M. (2016). "Hallelujah" Audio blog post. Revisionist History. Pushkin, July 28, 2016.
The science of innovations and creativity is amazing because I feel like we as individuals never fully realize the impacts of our actions and how they show creativity, It is almost like we are too close to our own actions to see them as changing or altering a field of expertise.
ReplyDeleteHi Ryan,
ReplyDeleteI love this! Yes, it is so true. I wonder how much "genius" is ignored, downplayed or discounted because of personal perception?